planned Benefit-level plan benchmarking is planned once normalized CMS Landscape and Plan Benefit Package data is ingested. Until then this hub covers carrier enrollment movement, plan exits, Stars movement and quality comparisons.
Use this comparison in Marketing Intelligence. The competitive landscape view reads the same carrier structure for positioning and message space.
How are carriers and plans performing — and where is the competitive movement?
Head-to-head carrier signals: star movement, measure erosion, plan exits.
Vintages differ by dataset on this page. Each card states the CMS source and the period its figure covers; enrollment, plan, star-rating and policy files are published on different schedules and are never forced onto one date. Every source, vintage and refresh cadence →
Primary deep-analysis destination · Carrier & plan intelligence
MA & D-SNP Competitive Lens
Analyze carrier share, Contract/PBP movement, product benefits, D-SNP positioning, competitive events and plan lifecycle using CMS-grounded evidence.
Open Competitive Lens →- GeographyPennsylvania, West Virginia, Delaware, Western New York, Northeastern New York (146 counties)
- EnrollmentCMS CPSC, Feb 2025 → Feb 2026 files
- BenefitsCMS PBP + Landscape, plan years 2025, 2026
- Carriers · plans32 carriers · 1082 Contract-PBP-years
- CMS reconciliation19 markets · 0 failures · validated 2026-09-26
- QA gates12 pass · 3 warning · 0 fail
Which carriers are gaining or losing stars?
Which star measures are dragging ratings down?
Which plans exited for 2026, and what successor plans were identified?
Who is growing and who is shrinking, state by state?